Forum Discussion
For your workflow, do you ever need to prioritize WHICH older leads deserve attention first?
Or because you follow up with everyone until they say stop, is prioritization basically unnecessary?
I'm testing whether prioritizing old quotes is actually useful or whether consistent nurture already solves the problem.
- Servicehomepro5 days agoContributor 3
Both matter, but they solve different problems, so it depends on which type of follow-up you're talking about.
Automated nurture (emails, texts on a schedule) should hit everyone consistently, that's cheap to run at scale and doesn't need prioritization, the system doesn't get tired or run out of hours in the day.
Prioritization matters most for where you spend actual human time, personal calls, custom follow-ups. That's a finite resource. If you've got 50 old quotes sitting there, you genuinely can't call all 50 with the same quality of attention in a day, so you need some way to decide who gets the real, human touch first.
A few things worth weighing when prioritizing: how old the quote actually is (a 6-month-old quote with zero engagement is statistically a lot less likely to convert than one from last week, chasing it as hard as a fresh one is often wasted effort), whether there's been any signal of continued interest (opened an email, visited your site again, asked a follow-up question), and whether it's a referral or repeat customer (those convert at a completely different rate than a cold quote, regardless of age).
So my honest answer: consistent automated nurture solves the "don't let anyone fall through the cracks" problem. Prioritization solves the "where do I personally spend my limited hours" problem. You probably need both, just for different parts of the workflow. michael0101