Claude vs Chat GPT

I started with ChatGPT and actually switched back to it briefly last December thinking it was better. Over time I landed back on Claude for one main reason: it does a better job following my voice when drafting client emails and communications. It picks up my style without me having to constantly correct it.

One thing worth knowing if you're on ChatGPT — the default settings are very agreeable. It will tell you your ideas are great even when they're not. You have to deliberately adjust that or you end up with false validation instead of useful feedback.

Both tools are evolving fast so I wouldn't call it permanent. But right now Claude handles my writing tasks better and pushes back when I need it.

I like TurfT​ started with GPT it was good, better than Gemini. However I did some testing with Claude and within a week I used Claude's prompt and pulled all my memories from GPT and put them in Claude and purchased a subscription. I now have the projects all built out with operational clarity. Its been the best tool we have used today for business building.

I've been using chat GPT pretty hard for the last year. I've dabbled in Claude. Mostly we've used chat gpt for writing quotes to copy and paste in to jobber, and we coded a website for our inventory. Claude does help with longer articles but I haven't tried to move all our stuff over because chat gpt has so much data. 

One thing I like more about chat gpt is the voice to talk feature lets you talk for a long time while claude it stops you. I hate having to keep watching my words come out and then it randomly cut you off and you have to hit record again. I'm a bit of a talker when it comes to AI. 

We use both ChatGPT and Claude. I’m still relatively new to Claude, but so far, it seems to reference the knowledge base we provided more effectively.

We started by asking ChatGPT (which already knows our business well) to create a set of instructions for Claude. Now, we use ChatGPT to build preliminary estimates, stress-test them in Claude, and then bring Claude’s feedback back to ChatGPT for further refinement.

Of course, we still verify the details and work through the actual numbers ourselves. However, for preliminary budgeting, this process has been working well. For context, we specialize in custom work, so pricing is rarely straightforward or easy to predict.

I’ve tested  A LOT of different AI models, and ChatGPT and Claude are still the two that consistently stay at the top for me.

I don’t think Claude is automatically more lucrative for business owners. The real ROI comes from the systems you build around the model, not just the model itself.

ChatGPT has been my main business command center: strategy, operations, estimating logic, workflows, client communication, automation ideas, SOPs, and decision support.

Claude is excellent, especially for long-form writing, reviewing large documents, and making copy feel a little more natural/human right out of the gate.

So if you already have a field bot and an entire C-suite built in ChatGPT Pro, I wouldn’t tear it down and rebuild just because Claude is getting buzz. I’d run Claude side-by-side on a few specific tasks and only move the pieces where it clearly performs better.

For me, it’s not really Claude vs ChatGPT. It’s ChatGPT as the operating system, Claude as a very sharp specialty tool in the same belt.

Chris
helixcraftworks.com

Grok all the way

I've used Bolt to build out my entire Admin portal for my website where I have built a complete CRM system, Reporting on clients, financial tracking, job tracking etc. I now have implemented a Claude API to take a picture of a product that i have built and create a gallery post for my website. It adds a title, description, alt tags and includes the location of where it was built. I've attached an example. 

Here is the gallery page where this is all created: Boxed2Built Gallery