Forum Discussion

WiringByron's avatar
WiringByron
Verified Community Coach
23 days ago

Should You Bring On an Equity Partner or Just Hire Someone to Grow Your Business?

I'm in the middle of working through a potential partnership where I'd bring on another owner-operator as an equity partner rather than just hiring them or buying them out.

Anyone here gone through something similar. Merging with another shop owner instead of just growing organically?

What made it work, or what would you do differently?

5 Replies

  • PestFreeCanada's avatar
    PestFreeCanada
    Verified Community Coach

    I am going to be following this thread as it is something I have thought about many times!

  • travisshepherd's avatar
    travisshepherd
    Verified Community Coach

    Bringing on an equity partner—especially another active shop owner—is a marriage with no easy divorce. Before giving away a chunk of your business, here are a few critical things to keep in mind from a builder’s perspective:

    ​1. You Need Complementary Roles

    ​Partnerships fail fast when both owners want to do the exact same thing. For this to work, you need a clear line in the sand:

    • One person owns the field: Operations, crews, equipment maintenance, quality control.
    • One person owns the office: Sales, marketing, estimating, tech, and customer management. If you’re both trying to manage the field or both trying to run admin, you'll step on each other's toes constantly.

    ​2. Pay W-2 Salaries BEFORE Profit Splits

    ​Never rely strictly on profit distributions for living income. Pay each other market-rate W-2 salaries for the actual labor put in day-to-day first. Profit distributions should only happen after overhead, reserves, and payroll are covered. If one person works 50 hours running crews and the other works 25 hours on admin, resentment builds fast if you're just splitting end-of-month profits 50/50.

    ​3. Protect Your Equity (Vesting & Exit Strategy)

    • Vesting Schedule: Don't hand over equity on Day 1. Set up a 3-to-4-year vesting schedule tied to time or specific revenue/margin milestones so they actually earn their stake.
    • Shotgun Clause: Get a legal buy-sell agreement drawn up. A shotgun clause means if you hit an irreconcilable deadlock, Partner A offers a buyout price per share, but Partner B gets the choice to either accept the buyout or buy Partner A out at that exact same price. It keeps everyone realistic.

    ​Consider a Performance-Based Hire First

    ​Ask yourself if you actually need a partner, or if you just need a key manager with an owner mindset. Hiring an Ops Manager or Lead Estimator on a base salary + 10–20% profit share on growth gets you that extra drive without handing over company equity or voting control.

    ​My Advice: Run a "Trial Marriage"

    ​Subcontract together or run a joint project for 60 to 90 days before signing any legal papers. You’ll see real fast how they handle equipment breakdowns, upset customers, and tight cash flow when the heat is on. 

    It's best to be completely onboard when and if you decide to do it.  It's better to be safe than sorry!!!

  • I haven't been in this exact situation, but I think it depends on long-term goals and trust. Bringing in an equity partner can speed up growth if both people share the same vision, values, and work ethic. Otherwise, hiring first might be the lower-risk option. I'd also make sure expectations, responsibilities, and an exit plan are clearly documented before making any partnership official.

  • roselvaggio's avatar
    roselvaggio
    Verified Community Coach

    I’ve never had an equity partner, and honestly I’ve considered, but never seriously considered it.

    In our industry (cleaning), profitability changes significantly once you reach a certain scale. As we’ve grown, we’ve been able to promote from within, develop leaders, and fill management roles with people who already understand our culture. Those promotions are meaningful for our team while still making financial sense for the business.

    Because of that, I’d rather invest in building leaders than giving up equity. Ownership is forever. Great employees can be rewarded with promotions, bonuses, profit sharing, or other incentives without permanently giving away part of the company.

    I think equity makes sense when someone brings something you simply can’t build yourself or when you’re entering a completely different phase of business. Otherwise, I’d focus on building the right team and systems first.

  • roselvaggio's avatar
    roselvaggio
    Verified Community Coach

    I’ve never had an equity partner, and honestly I’ve considered, but never seriously considered it.

    In our industry (cleaning), profitability changes significantly once you reach a certain scale. As we’ve grown, we’ve been able to promote from within, develop leaders, and fill management roles with people who already understand our culture. Those promotions are meaningful for our team while still making financial sense for the business.

    Because of that, I’d rather invest in building leaders than giving up equity. Ownership is forever. Great employees can be rewarded with promotions, bonuses, profit sharing, or other incentives without permanently giving away part of the company.

    I think equity makes sense when someone brings something you simply can’t build yourself or when you’re entering a completely different phase of business. Otherwise, I’d focus on building the right team and systems first.